The Killer Angels

“What a piece of work is man…in action how like and angel…well, boy if he is an angel he’s sure a murdering angel.” —Michael Shaara

A quick note.

On the front lines of The Killer Angels. A fine book about the Battle of Gettysburg. I have a new found appreciation for the horrors and complexities of war. And the complexities of motivation, too. A convoluted affair, the Civil War.

Despite that, the aesthetics of Shaara’s novel is a reminder that syntactical simplicity is powerful a tool for rendering action.

I’ve always been a fan of stylistic fragments. Here, they reach minimalistic perfection.

“Then he saw the Rebs,” is good, but grammar is still intact. A rule is still present. Not so in the din of battle where rules break down and orders are tough to follow.

Sat down on a rock.
A flank attack.
Never to withdraw.

Three fragments, three paragraphs — mimicking the staccato of gun fire. Boom. Boom. Boom.

Here’s another instance:

Dirt and leaves in his mouth. Rolling over…. Said something. Noise to great to hear. Turned. Fire slowing.

One of my favorite techniques is when Shaara leads with a verb to create a distinct action within a larger set of actions that threaten to overwhelm it. Quick, pin it to the page before it’s gone!

Saw: A red flag, down in the smoke and dark.

Speaking of verbs, Shaara puts them to fine use the good, old-fashioned way, too. Military commanders “gloom” and “brood” while artillery “blooms” and “blossoms.”

Thought: time to return to the front lines. (Cheers?)

4 Responses to The Killer Angels

  1. Those sentence make for a fine effect. What is Shaara like when he is not doing this sort of disorienting battlefield writing?

    • A joy to read, really. Strong descriptive writing about fields, barns, towns, landscapes. A knack for free indirect speech. He’s a fan of working his way into the heads of opposing military commanders. He’s also very good at sustaining a rapid pace, as though the novel’s momentum, like the action it portrays, is beyond the power of any one writer/general. Good stuff all in all. Happy to be reading it and not Molloy!

  2. I should try to get to the book this year. It sounds great.

Leave a Reply to Amateur Reader (Tom) Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: